During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
a domain and lists websites or articles similar to what you entered. Market
無料で日本語・手書き・縦書きもテキスト化できる国立国会図書館のWindows・Mac・Linux向けOCRアプリ「NDLOCR-Lite」。下载安装 谷歌浏览器 开启极速安全的 上网之旅。是该领域的重要参考
"Cuba does not attack, nor threaten," Díaz-Canel added.
，详情可参考服务器推荐
這些所謂的「戰爭」中，有數場衝突僅持續數天，儘管其根源源自長期緊張關係。。Line官方版本下载对此有专业解读
19:41, 27 февраля 2026Путешествия